I fully support Terry Schiavo's right to life, but this is a childish, inflammatory and nonsensical vanity.
How is that nonsensical? It makes perfect sense to me. Liberals should be forced to confront the horror of what they suggest head on. If shooting her in the had is distasteful, then how is starving her to death a "reasonable position that should be discussed". Illustrating with absurdity is sometimes the only way.
By the way, regarding my letter being "childish", I have been accused of being childish and nonsensical by pro-abortionists by showing them photos of aborted babies and 3-d ultrasounds to show how developed a baby is at a young age. Why is it nonsensical to show somebody how evil a position they hold is?
By the way, regarding my letter being "childish", I have been accused of being childish and nonsensical by pro-abortionists by showing them photos of aborted babies and 3-d ultrasounds to show how developed a baby is at a young age. Why is it nonsensical to show somebody how evil a position they hold is?
Why are you so cruel to prefer starving someone's beloved daughter? For so you do by taking Smerconish's side in this -- even in part. If Smerconish agrees she should be offed, why not then do so with less cruelty than a long starvation?
What's a damn difference? It's murder either way.