[Quix]

Some on this thread seem to be sounding like experts on sleep paralysis and hallucinations. I doubt seriously most have even half my credentials on those topics.

I find the statements on those issues on this thread so far to be shallow, cheap shots very short of a full treatment of the full topic from anything remotely close to objective.

BTW--re the program. I like Friedman's interview with Marcell. How can anyone refute that?

[SlightOfTongue]

Check your mail (2nd notice). And do you have a site where you can send me. I can elaborate on a lot of stuff I've mentioned here tonight.

SOT

[SalukiLawyer]

Some on this thread seem to be sounding like experts on sleep paralysis and hallucinations. I doubt seriously most have even half my credentials on those topics.

My credentials are I had an awareness during sleep paralysis experience once, which, like sex, is a whole lot more to the point than only reading about it :-) Also, I do have some experience in credibility of eyewitness accounts, and how untrue beliefs can be shaped by the investigative process.

I'm not anti-UFO at all. I think something more is going on that the skeptical scientists on the show are willing to admit. I am just keeping an open mind about what most of them may be. I just don't believe the typical abduction stories, that's all, because they are, to my mind, satisfactorially explained by the stuff I discussed earlier.

I come in peace!

[cajungirl]

Oh quix, don't get all territorial and envious. You would be surprised at what experts people on FR are on alot of subjects. Besides, you can chip in with your expertise any old time,,we love to kibitz.