Repeating the same profanity does not make you correct.
The Army relies on the National Guard. You wish to tie the National Guard to the border for all time. That means the rest of the Army might as well stay in garrison, because they will be unable to fight and win wars.
Btw, do you finally understand the concept of odds, or do you need further instruction?
I fully understand the concept of "odds." You merely maintain the already high odds of al-Qaeda using another attack vector--specifically, one of the ones you would leave uncovered, such as over-the-beach or the Canadian border, which are both woefully uncovered today relative to the Mexican border--and cripple the Army's ability to deploy and fight overseas in the process.
Your stated mission of "homeland security" is a shield for the real mission of shutting down illegal immigration from Mexico. The mission of shutting down illegal immigration is not so vital to the safety of the Republic that it requires crippling the United States Army.
The Army is indeed being helped by the NG in Iraq at this time, but it doesn't rely on it to be deployable. And your assertion that if we deploy NG troops on the border the army "can't go anywhere else" is laughably ignorant.
You merely maintain the already high odds of al-Qaeda using another attack vector--specifically, one of the ones you would leave uncovered, such as over-the-beach or the Canadian border
You assume I was referring to deploying both NG troops and extra BP only on our Southern border -- and you're wrong, as is your wont.
Your stated mission of "homeland security" is a shield for the real mission of shutting down illegal immigration from Mexico.
Does continuing to make false assumptions - making a complete and public ass out of yourself in the process - get you off or something? You are one sick dude, Poob.