We don't need 'peer reviews' when we have 'first-hand' testamonies
http://www.protectkids.com/effects/
http://www.firesofdarkness.com/pornography_addiction.htm
http://www.no-porn.com/test.html
An entire database here, all dealing with sex crimes and porn
http://blog.watchright.com/?skinid=24&page=links
Go to a search engine and type in "porn addiction" and discover for yourself just how powerfully addictive porn is and how it destroys lives
Around November of last year I started receiving pornographic DVDs in the mail, and then in December I started receiving a Playboy Magazine subscription, but I never subscribed to either. It's quite frustrating to have that trash delivered to our home.
The magazine arrives in a security plastic wrapper, just like some of our financial publications, so the first (and only) time I opened the Playboy Magazine wrapper, I was quite shocked to find something other than a financial publication.
I know the power of porn and refuse to get hooked, so now the wife opens all the security wrapped mail. I'd really like to know how I got on their subscription list. While I'm not sure what we can do about it, I'm going to ask the wife to save the next one and see if we can put a stop to it.
Actually, you do. First-hand testamonies (better known as "anecdoctal evidence") are of little value if you're trying to prove a greater statistical point. You argued that porn is as addictive as crack. I'm sure there are some people who believe that porn was that addictive to them, but there are also plenty of people who believe that they've been abducted by aliens. Show me a peer-reviewed article in a reputable medical journal that makes this case and you have some evidence.