This is Ann's best column since the Specter column back in last year's Pennsylvania's Senatorial primary.
LOL!!! Ann Coulter ping.
No wonder the Helen Thomases and Maureen Dowds of the world don't like her.... too much to compete, hehe.
After all, they've convinced me of the urgency, what with this horrible Gannon/Guckert thing!!!
LOL. No we don't
An absolutely perfect Ann Coulter article.
Bang, Coulter leaves the Earth scorched again.
No mercy for pitiful liberals.
To Ann: BULLSEYE! Yet again you nailed it.
Now if only we could force the NYT to make Dowd admit to her Dowdification about the "day pass" misrepresentation by omission.
One of them was kinda funny, it was about Clinton being the first "black" president, and Kerry possibly being the first "Gay" president because gays loved him.
(Denny Crane: "There are two places to find the truth. First God and then Fox News.")
Is this is real picture or is it photoshoped?
Liberals keep telling us the media isn't liberal, but in order to retaliate for the decimation of major news organizations like the New York Times, CBS News and CNN, all they can do is produce the scalp of an obscure writer for an unknown conservative Web page. And unlike Raines, Rather and Jordan, they can't even get Gannon for incompetence on the job. (Also unlike Raines, Rather and Jordan, Gannon has appeared on television and given a series of creditable interviews in his own defense, proving our gays are more macho than their straights.)
Ann is defending this gay guy just to take a shot at the MSM/liberals. Bottom line is if Gannon (and the party) wasn't ashamed of (his) being gay he (they) wouldn't have quit his job (kicked him to the curb). Let this story die. It's as pointless as most of the stuff Ann writes.
Looks like Beretta's, er, I mean a Beretta to me. Gal can sure shoot straight, don'tchaknow!
Geez Ann, so much for the, 'words will never hurt me' rhyme.
Killer wit and sarcasm. Each paragraph is a scream!
Ann ping!
The old media lies, lies, lies, and they are after us also.
The old media lies, lies, lies, and they are after us also.
This is really the same old story - the Left only like "minorities" if said minority shares their political opinion. I have no idea who Gannon is - it sounds like he's got something of a contradiction between public and private personae. It was not the job of the White House to get information on whether this contradiction existed in order to issue him with a simple daily pass to a press conference. Nor was it the job of the White House to tell him to ask a pointed question. Their job is to see if he was working for a news organisation of some description. The answer is, yes, he was. The other task is to see if he was a security risk, i.e. was he in any way linked to terrorism. The answer obviously is, no, he wasn't. Beyond this, the White House is not obliged to waste tax money on investigating the private life of every member of the Press Corps; considering the lives of some of them, that kind of checking would be a distinctly unenviable task.
In the absence of malfesance by the White House or by Gannon in the performance of his role, the Left only has the stick of Gannon's alleged homosexuality to beat him with. If Gannon had been a Democrat, of course, they would have closed ranks around him. But as he's conservative, he's fair game to them. Which proves that as much as the Left supposedly detests bigotry, they never hesitate to use it if they think they will gain by doing so.
Regards, Ivan