There it is, your whole problem, your inability to rationalize the control of our borders without invading our neighbor.
You claim, on the one hand, that Mexico is invading this country, which is an act of war. - YES
On the other hand, you refuse to take the logical step needed to win this war you claim is underway. That step is to invade and conquer Mexico. You refuse to do it. - YOU DID IT AGAIN! you said invade.
I will say it one more time: if you are saying "invasion," then you are saying we are at war--but you refuse to accept the consequences of your argument. - AND AGAIN!
Either you need to start arguing for the invasion and conquest of Mexico, or you need to admit that you don't believe your own argument. - AND AGAIN!
Stop saying invade! We can load up the border and stop anyone who crosses it or scare the hell out of them by show of force to not even try, that is a cold war.
You fail to comprehend this fact.
There it is, your whole problem, your inability to rationalize the control of our borders without invading our neighbor.Separate issues. You are unable to engage in debate without reaching for hyperbole, and then you get upset when you're called on it.
Stop saying invade!
You first.
We can load up the border and stop anyone who crosses it or scare the hell out of them by show of force to not even try, that is a cold war.
And the second that force is gone, we have the same problem all over again.
Invading and conquering Mexico would solve the problem for good.
You seem to want a permanent problem, not a solution.
And you engage in BS hyperbole to get your permanent problem.
You, sir, are the one slinging around the term "invasion."
If you are really serious about this being an invasion, then treat it as such, invade Mexico, and be done with it.
If you're not willing to do that, then please leave this discussion for those of us who know what words mean.