Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jackbenimble; Poohbah

Again, should we waste assets and personnel who are supposed to be protecting our national security interests to chase after busboys, gardeners, janitors, maids, and nannies?

I don't think we should. So, if anything, this program would enhance national security.

Cheap? Well, if you think tightening the border to the poitn we can prevent it is going to be cheap, guess again. They've done manpower studies. Get back to me when you have looked up what sort of density was needed for Operations "Gatekeeper" and "Hold the Line."


100 posted on 02/23/2005 8:17:21 AM PST by hchutch (A pro-artificial turf, pro-designated hitter baseball fan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]


To: hchutch
Again, should we waste assets and personnel who are supposed to be protecting our national security interests to chase after busboys, gardeners, janitors, maids, and nannies?

They currently cost us about $10 billion at the Federal level and they costs the State of California $9 billion and they cost Arizona about $1.3 billion annually NET OF THE TAXES THEY PAY.

If we keep letting in more and more of them don't you think it is reasonable to assume that these costs will keep going up?

Aren't all these tax dollars a waste of assets?

I have responded to each of your questions but you have not responded to my questions in my first post to you. Until you answer them, I don't feel any need to continue this discussion.

107 posted on 02/23/2005 8:26:44 AM PST by jackbenimble (Import the third world, become the third world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson