To: Endeavor
I think nothing further needs to be said - Her Majesty can designate her heir in her will.
Regards, Ivan
17 posted on
02/22/2005 1:18:53 PM PST by
MadIvan
(One blog to bring them all...and in the Darkness bind them: http://www.theringwraith.com/)
To: MadIvan
I thought that there had been some parlimentery proceedings after William and Mary that defined the succession???
To: MadIvan
Her Majesty can designate her heir in her will. Didn't work for Henry I
45 posted on
02/22/2005 1:26:03 PM PST by
Oztrich Boy
("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free")
To: MadIvan
It amazes me how possessive and opinionated many English are about the subject of the royal family. I thought Charles should get married, but his wife should not be named queen. And hell, if she designates her heir in her will, then whats all the fuss about?
46 posted on
02/22/2005 1:26:32 PM PST by
KC_Conspirator
(This space outsourced to India)
To: MadIvan
I had no idea she could designate in her will who will succeed her to the thrown.
85 posted on
02/22/2005 1:39:27 PM PST by
Endeavor
To: MadIvan
Her Majesty can designate her heir in her will Ivan, is that still valid or does the law of primogeniture prevail?
141 posted on
02/22/2005 2:19:09 PM PST by
pbear8
(Rummy will do premarital counseling for Charles and Camilla - National Enquirer)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson