Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Poland Urged Not To Buy Boeing Planes
WBBM ^

Posted on 02/22/2005 7:50:29 AM PST by wk4bush2004

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: wk4bush2004

Are they also proposing that Poland buy their computers from Bull? (anyone remember them? anyone? anyone?)


41 posted on 02/22/2005 8:37:28 AM PST by henkster ("The time has come for someone to put their foot down, and that foot is me." Dean Vernon Wormer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wk4bush2004

The operating costs on the 380 are going to be ridiculous. It is an amazing piece of engineering but it is a behmoth and will costs an outrageous amount of effort to maintain. If I get a chance to fly one I certainly will. I would much rather be cocooned in American engineering though. Airbus has a bad record of flight control problems. As for the French pushing their will on Poland, I don't think it will have much effect. This appears to be an act of desperation.


42 posted on 02/22/2005 8:37:57 AM PST by ChinaThreat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: wk4bush2004

It will come down to COST, and the Euro's have a way of making the Airbus "cheaper"...


43 posted on 02/22/2005 8:39:34 AM PST by Paradox (Occam was probably right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChinaThreat

And another things is filling the plane up. An airline will absolutely not make money on the A380 unless they fill it up. And the limited number of serviceable airports around the world is also a big minus.

The Boeing 787 is the way to go. It's fast, innovative, comfortable and can get customers where they want to go.


44 posted on 02/22/2005 8:41:27 AM PST by wk4bush2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Paradox

By cheating.


45 posted on 02/22/2005 8:42:10 AM PST by wk4bush2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

Any aviation company can build Airplanes. It comes down to Business decisions.
I do question the feasibility of the 380 having to fly only to a few hubs. This system has proven to be the downfall for many mainstream companies. We will see the reults in about 15 years.
Right now the 380 is having some problems with weight and the maiden voyage is being delayed.


46 posted on 02/22/2005 8:42:45 AM PST by americanbychoice2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: wk4bush2004

Agreed. I was loading up on a 767-400 in ATL a couple of weeks ago and it took nearly an hour to board the aircraft. I think Boeing has made amazing leaps with the 777 series. In my opinion it is the most amazing aircraft on the market. Unfortunately, I have not had the pleasure of traveling on one yet.


47 posted on 02/22/2005 8:44:06 AM PST by ChinaThreat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Absolute non-sense. It is not an army of occupation! You do realise that the Luftwaffe sit and have sat with dual-key US nuclear weapons.


48 posted on 02/22/2005 8:45:51 AM PST by Tommyjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ChinaThreat

I have and the 777 is definately an amazing aircraft. It is comfortable and has a wide, spacious cabin. The flights are smooth and the power from those two engines is incredible. The 777 is definately better than the A340.


49 posted on 02/22/2005 8:46:00 AM PST by wk4bush2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: RJL
For regional trips of 100~450 miles, modern passenger rail systems are MUCH more efficient than short-hop air service.
Heck, Poland is only 400 miles square (roughly).
They really should stick with trains and Maglev,
let the other Euroweenies waste their money on planes!!!
50 posted on 02/22/2005 8:47:22 AM PST by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: wk4bush2004

Next thing you know France will want Poland and Thailand to buy a nuclear aircraft carrier from them.


51 posted on 02/22/2005 8:48:01 AM PST by OrioleFan (Republicans believe every day is July 4th, DemocRATs believe every day is April 15th. - Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wk4bush2004

Good thing Bent is not in office so Airbus could cry to him again and get Boeing called off.


52 posted on 02/22/2005 9:04:22 AM PST by Fast1 (Destroy America buy Chinese goods.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wk4bush2004

God, I'm growing to hate these Euro people.

They might be Americas biggest enemy. Bush should get the he-- out of there.


53 posted on 02/22/2005 9:06:13 AM PST by Finalapproach29er (Open borders=National suicide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Time is now

When Boeing decided on the 787 rout, they were being criticized. Everyone was talking about the AirBus techonology was going to leave Boeing in the snow drift. Now it looks like it's just the opposite. Allot of marketing is already going on to sell the AirBus. Did anyone see John Revolta hawking it last week? It looks like a marvelous plane. But is it safe and reliable. How long is going to take to deplane and get your luggage? I mean think about that for a minute. You spend two hours on either end of a flight from Paris to New York? The Boeing 787 has an incredible range and you in and out.

I think the winner is going to be Boeing. Did Concorde ever make money?

nick


54 posted on 02/22/2005 9:06:54 AM PST by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

Most engine manufacturers use the same testing regime for their engines on large commercial turbofans. Ice ingestion, rain ingestion, bird strikes (frozen and thawed), compressor blade failure containment are all standard protocol. Airbus's engines are not unique in this standpoint.


55 posted on 02/22/2005 9:08:49 AM PST by ChromeDome (Every person's death diminishes me. Some more than others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: wk4bush2004

The 787 is the same as 7E7,right?

I saw the 7E7, beautiful aircraft.


56 posted on 02/22/2005 9:09:18 AM PST by Finalapproach29er (Open borders=National suicide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: wk4bush2004
And the limited number of serviceable airports around the world is also a big minus.

I think I heard that there are only four airports in the US that can accomodate it without major modifications.

57 posted on 02/22/2005 9:11:13 AM PST by BlackRazor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: RJL

It's a nice cozy story and first broke on the back of the Tsunami disaster. The Thai Airways orders for A380s was placed in August 2004. This was of course before any Tsunami or row over prawns. It's amazing how a "EU bashing" "France bashing" story can do the rounds on the web!

At one point Thailand morphed itself into Cambodia on Freepers. Subsequently some Freepers were in uproar about poor Cambodia being forced to buy these gigantic airliners.


58 posted on 02/22/2005 9:12:10 AM PST by Tommyjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ChromeDome

I was talking about Boeing's engines being tested not airbus'. The report said that they are the best tested engines ever. I think the 787 will be the safest most reliable plane ever made.

nick


59 posted on 02/22/2005 9:39:39 AM PST by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Tommyjo
It looks like the story at the Scotsman may have been in error, although it’s still up on their web site without any correction.

Tsunami-hit Thais told: Buy six planes or face EU tariffs
FRASER NELSON
POLITICAL EDITOR
Thailand has been told by the European Commission that it must buy six A380 Airbus aircraft if it wants to escape the tariffs against its fishing industry.
http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/international.cfm?id=66782005

This article claims the Scotsman got it wrong. Notice, as of Jan 27 the deal still was not final.

Thursday, January 27, 2005 – Thailand and the EU - who's really playing hardball? As it turns out, the European Union seems not to have put the screws to Thailand over its purchase of the new A380 airliner.

The issue, as reported by The Scotsman newspaper, was that the EU was raising the tariff on Thai-exported prawns, a kind of large shrimp, unless Thailand agreed to buy more super-jumbo Airbus A380 planes at about a half-billion each.

But as EUBusiness now reports, The Scotsman got it wrong.

A major aircraft deal between Thailand and European consortium Airbus is likely to go ahead
http://www.donaldsensing.com/2005/01/thailand-and-eu-whos-really-playing.html

60 posted on 02/22/2005 11:21:58 AM PST by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson