Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PatrickHenry
"Intelligent Design is not a scientific theory."

Excellent.
2 posted on 02/22/2005 7:36:04 AM PST by crail (Better lives have been lost on the gallows than have ever been enshrined in the halls of palaces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: crail
So speaks the evo-Pope and his evo-Cardinals! Why can't ID even be considered by the mock-scientists of our age? Because Evolution (that classical TOE "Evolution" with no desinger, no constant tuning and sustain by that designer) only stands as unchallengeable dogma.

The Holy Church of Rome in the Dark Ages equally denied all upstarts and challenges any validity at all.

How does it feel to be with the new Dark Agers?

46 posted on 02/22/2005 8:13:47 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: crail

>>"Intelligent Design is not a scientific theory."

Excellent.<<

I agree.

I also think intelligent design is how it happened.


279 posted on 02/22/2005 2:05:50 PM PST by RobRoy (Child support and maintenence (alimony) are what we used to call indentured slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson