I never implied Gurn was a coward but that it was easy to advocate open wordlwide warfare when one will be comfortably esconsed in ones easy chair.
The burden and price of this kind of action will be paid by our men and women in the service. I believe that must be taken into consideration when one advocates the type of violence as Gurn does.
Let Gurn come on a fight his own battles. Does Gurn believe the price we pay in terms of death and disability to our servicemen and women is worth the type of worldwide jihad against Muslims he advocates? Has he thought this through?
I think that is a fair question.
Your Post 36:Of course, none of these people are wearing a uniform or will be in a position to be put on the front lines of this "global war". I'd say a pretty safe position from which to "let loose the dogs of war" rhetoric.
Your Post 90: Our soldiers would be in a shitstorm, you'd safely be in the dollar bleachers where you could cheer on the blood games and heckle the unit officers whenever they drop the ball.
There are a lot of Freepers, myself included, who beleive Muslims lie easily. The lies in your posts indicate that you may be Muslim.