Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DannyTN
"But flesh with the life thereof, which is the blood thereof, shall ye not eat."


I'm not a theologian, but this sounds more like a condemnation of cannibalism than a condemnation of meat eating.
66 posted on 02/21/2005 2:51:19 PM PST by NW Mike (Proud member of the VRWC since 1972 -- who the hell are you calling 'neo'?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: NW Mike
"I'm not a theologian, but this sounds more like a condemnation of cannibalism than a condemnation of meat eating."

It's neither. The verse before it, that every living thing which moves shall be meat for you, clearly eliminates a prohibition on meat.

But life was associated with the blood of animals in the sacrifice. It was the blood of the lamb on the door that saved the Israelites during the passover in Egypt. It was the blood offering that was the sin offering. It's believed that's why cain's offering was rejected, is because it wasn't a blood offering. The whole sacrifice system was to foreshadow Jesus.

I don't know that the Israelites had a prohibition on canibalism, or needed one. They were to bury their dead. You couldn't kill a man, and dead things were unclean, so it was pretty much excluded.

89 posted on 02/21/2005 3:22:05 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson