To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
OMG....the BEEB reporting good news from Iraq.
Will wonders never cease.
2 posted on
02/21/2005 1:50:13 PM PST by
Dog
(FReepers-- - -- --- We are a battery of 80,000 bullsh*t-seeking missiles.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
How you holding up with all the rain out your way?
3 posted on
02/21/2005 1:50:48 PM PST by
Dog
(FReepers-- - -- --- We are a battery of 80,000 bullsh*t-seeking missiles.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
This sounds a lot like the wetlands nonsense in our own country. Saddam was evil, but now that the swamps are drained, what's wrong with making it into something productive instead of letting it go back to a worthless bog. I guess envirowhackism has come to Iraq.
7 posted on
02/21/2005 2:00:04 PM PST by
balch3
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
It don't give a damn about the environment, but the Arabs who live in the Marshes need those bogs to survive.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
If Bush had drained the Everglades, or (somehow) filled in the Grand Canyon, or poured cement down Old Faithful, or clear-cut Yosemite, wonder how many leftists would have called for him to be overthrown?
But Saddam, naw, he was such a good America hater that it was OK when he deliberately damaged the environment, whether lighting up Kuwaiti oil fields or draining marshes.
13 posted on
02/21/2005 2:44:07 PM PST by
WmDonovan
(http://www.geocities.com/thelawndaletimes)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The marsh areas covered a vast expanse and sustained a population of some 200.000. Saddam's action might be described as ecological terrorism.
14 posted on
02/21/2005 2:52:51 PM PST by
Fred Nerks
(Understand Evil: Read THE LIFE OF MUHAMMAD. Link on my Page. free pdf.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson