Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alex Marko

If Iraq was once a part of the Garden of Eden, then the place has sure gone to hell in a handbasket....


2 posted on 02/21/2005 7:06:55 AM PST by Lurking2Long
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Lurking2Long
If Iraq was once a part of the Garden of Eden, then the place has sure gone to hell in a handbasket....

In the summer here, we say that it's sort of like Hell must be...barren, dusty and hot as....well, Hell.

17 posted on 02/21/2005 7:37:03 AM PST by Allegra ("They Just Love to Walk in the Middle of the Road!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Lurking2Long

The area from The mouth of the Euphrates to Damascus to the Jordan River valley used to be called the fertile crescent until the poor farming practices of the natives combined with the resurgence of Arab pastoral practices after the Islamic conquests deforested the land, drying it up and making it into a desert. If you have ever seen photos of Israel when it was part of the Ottoman Empire before extensive Jewish immigration you will see how much of a craphole the place was. Now after years of reforestation and modern farming practices, that area is in much better shape.


18 posted on 02/21/2005 7:39:03 AM PST by nuke rocketeer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Lurking2Long

It's biblical!


21 posted on 02/21/2005 7:47:40 AM PST by dcnd9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Lurking2Long

Well I don't know if the Garden of Eden was in Iraq, but if it was the place went into Babylon = confusion, since those days.


41 posted on 02/21/2005 10:04:27 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Lurking2Long
The first scientific assessment of the marshes in southern Iraq, al considered by some to have been the Biblical location of the Garden of Eden, was presented to the American Association for the Advancement of Science meeting in Washington.

I've heard this claim made before, and it is so stupid. Assuming the creation is literally true (which I do), the former world was destroyed in the flood. The Euphrates and Tigris rivers that exist today are not the same rivers mentioned pre-flood. They are rivers that were named for those rivers. The Garden of Eden could have been in Nebraska or Japan. The former world was washed away. Noah was in the ark for a year, floating randomly. None of the previous landmarks would have survived the flood, although new landmarks would be named for the old ones.

126 posted on 02/23/2005 9:25:10 AM PST by Richard Kimball (It was a joke. You know, humor. Like the funny kind. Only different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson