[Thatcherite]

Evolutionists themselves disagree on just what the fossils mean and just how old they are.

ToE predicts disagreement on such issues since the fossil record is imperfect and the definition of species hard to tie down. What is much more interesting is that creationist scientists who study fossil hominids also cannot agree amongst themselves on their classification. This ought to be surprising to creationists, given that it is a tenet of creationism that there are no man/ape transitionals. I believe that I have pointed this out to you before so it is surprising that you continue to post this particular argument.

[RaceBannon]

Actually, what is pointed out continually, is that the FOSSIL RECORD is in doubt because all it is, is dead things buried down in rock layers laid down by water.

And that is all it is.

It is not proof of anything in itself, it is just dead things buried in rock layers laid down by water.

Where you go from there is the issue.

NONE of the evolutionary theories can stand the scrutiny of the fossil record, as I clearly show and as this most recent article proves ("Neanderthal" skull was actually human but because of false dates was accepted as ancient...meaning not one 'Evolutionary Expert' had the brains to see it was a "modern Human")

And that is the whole point here.

Repeatedly, Evolutionists theories have been destroyed when science steps in and tells them how wrong they are, but then all the evolutionist does is change their theories to match the preconceived notions that everything evolved, whereas the Creationist just has to sit back and laugh and wait for GOOD SCIENCE to expose the latest complex FRAUD upon science, and then engage in trying to educate those who think they are so smart to accept a modern skull as an ancient NEANDERTAHAL Skull.