To: nasamn777
ID makes the claim that it is possible to detect intelligence by examining the information content of patterns.
And how do they justify this claim? "It just is?"
Naturalists don't allow the possibility that there may exist non-natural processes -- which limits science.
How does not addressing subject matter beyond the scope of scientific inquiry limit science?
673 posted on
02/23/2005 11:15:37 AM PST by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Dimensio
Perhaps you should read up on the subject before you are so quick to criticize it. How about reading Dembski's "No Free Lunch".
How does not addressing subject matter beyond the scope of scientific inquiry limit science?
So are you telling me that you cannot tell if a person died due to natural causes or by murder? Have you ever heard of forensic science?
And how about archeology? Can we determine if an artifact is due to natural processes or due to the craftsmanship of a early human?
How about SETI? Is it possible to distinguish a natural signal from an alien signal?
We can use natural science to determine a natural pattern from an intelligently designed pattern! ID is a useful science!
711 posted on
02/23/2005 8:32:57 PM PST by
nasamn777
(The emperor wears no clothes -- I am sorry to tell you!)
To: Dimensio; nasamn777
ID makes the claim that it is possible to detect intelligence by examining the information content of patterns.
And how do they justify this claim? "It just is?"Ever heard of writing?
721 posted on
02/24/2005 1:25:33 AM PST by
AndrewC
(Darwinian logic -- It is just-so if it is just-so)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson