[FairOpinion]

Gannon is still using that name. Lots of writers use pseudonyms.

The question, that broke the camel's back for the Dems is this:


"Senate Democratic leaders have painted a very bleak picture of the US economy. Harry Reid was talking about soup lines, and Hillary Clinton was talking about the economy being on the verge of collapse. Yet, in the same breath, they say that Social Security is rock solid and there's no crisis there. How are you going to work -- you said you're going to reach out to these people -- how are you going to work with people who seem to have divorced themselves from reality?"

[dennisw]

"Senate Democratic leaders have painted a very bleak picture of the US economy. Harry Reid was talking about soup lines, and Hillary Clinton was talking about the economy being on the verge of collapse. Yet, in the same breath, they say that Social Security is rock solid and there's no crisis there. How are you going to work -- you said you're going to reach out to these people -- how are you going to work with people who seem to have divorced themselves from reality?"

That was Jeff Gannon's introduction to a question. I hear opposite type intros all the time from the usual MSM crew in the White House press corps

[Loyal Buckeye]

Thanks.

So, what's up the "reporter formerly known as Gannon" thing?

Also, I have concluded that the question is a valid and insightful question.