Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MEG33

Yes, I know that. I read the papers too. It is also the title of the thread, and hense the topic of discussion.

So, if you object to Condi then who better to replace Cheney?


272 posted on 02/19/2005 10:37:22 AM PST by Danae (In waking a Tiger, use a long stick - R. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies ]


To: Danae

I don't object..I simply am saying the VP is not exactly a a sure place to run for President..Only Theodore Roosevelt and Bush sr have successfully run for President this past century while serving as VPs.
I believe Rice is sorely needed as Secy of State.


274 posted on 02/19/2005 10:42:08 AM PST by MEG33 (GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies ]

To: everyone

This story is very poorly backed up. It's sheer speculation.
Even if Condi wants to run, and even if she'd be a stronger candidate as vice president than as (recently resigned) secretary of state -- both huge "ifs" -- I can't believe that Bush wants to lose Cheney, or that Cheney would quit if Bush still wants him, absent an extremely serious health issue. Things this dramatic rarely happen in politics, and Cheney is not an especially dramatic guy.


275 posted on 02/19/2005 10:42:36 AM PST by California Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson