Posted on 02/18/2005 1:33:59 PM PST by areafiftyone
San Antonio radio producer Susan Farris could always count on James Guckert, a.k.a. former White House correspondent Jeff Gannon, to pitch an appearance on the shows she produces at conservative talk station KTSA.
He was not only anxious about pushing his story of the day, but seemed to always have some kind of inside knowledge about the White House, as well.
"I said, 'How do you have such great sources?' and he just laughed it off," she told E&P Friday. "Now we all know how."
Farris, who has worked in San Antonio radio for more than a decade, said she came across Guckert first at GOPUSA.com, then later read his work on Talon News, his online home prior to his recent resignation. "I would call [GOPUSA] for people to use on the air and they suggested him when I asked about White House coverage," she recalled. "They called themselves a re-write service. They would take other people's work and put it up on their site." (Among the charges against Guckert was that he often simply rewrote White House press releases as news stories.)
Guckert, she said, frequently passed on what he clearly thought was insider information, during his 12 appearances on KTSA during 2003 and 2004. She first heard from him the expression "shock and awe" to refer to the massive U.S. bombing attack at the start of the Iraq war, and he fingered Mary Mapes as the producer of the so-called "Rathergate" segment on "60 Minutes" before she had seen that mentioned elsewhere.
"He very often called me and offered to be on the show to talk about his stories," she said. "I used to book him all the time. We used him on tons of White House stuff." She said she "had no idea" that Gannon was not Guckert's real name.
Sure you can. Because that's different. :)
wait....he was a gay hooker?
A member of the WH Press Corps is going to get far more scrutiny than someone getting a DOD pass. Not only are you close to the President and administration officials on a regular basis, but you're much more important to the message the WH is trying to get out, and there are only a few people who are eligible to cover the WH in the first place because it presumes some professional background. Someone getting a day pass every day for a couple of years is also an unusual case.
This Gannon incident is obviously bad news, but it's such a stupid little thing that there's nowhere for it to go. Ooh, America cares about the WH press corps. Whatever.
The point is she's citing the phrase as evidence of inside knowledge and E&P publishes that nonsense as if it has significance.
If they reach anymore there arms are gonna come right outa their sockets.
duder was spreading disinfo about Editor and Publisher. It's a strong lib site that poses as unbiased (MSM anyone?).
"duder" got zotted
He is probably a Freeper and got it here.
http://gort.ucsd.edu/newjour/e/msg02675.html
Editor & Publisher is a 116-year-old magazine covering the newspaper industry in North America. Its products include both print and electronic periodicals, as well as a line of annual newspaper industry reference books and market data reports in both print and CD-ROM formats. Editor & Publisher magazine is the oldest independent journal covering all aspects of the North American newspaper. The 10-times yearly Editor & Publisher Interactive section covers the rapidly expanding business of news gathering and
distribution via the Internet and other online services.
Abstracts and full-text articles are available in HTML format.
Editor-In-Chief: Sidney Holt
A full investigation takes time. Lots of it. No one is going to do that for a day pass.
Not that unusual. Apparently there are several others in there who also routinely use day passes (including a Naderite).
You just described the entire press coverage.
No, they're not. The daily pass was a routine security check based on name and Social Security number and checked for anything of a threatening nature, not even close to the scrutiny you seem to imagine. The hard pass, which Gannon did not have, does include a more expansive check.
How has the White House been "discredited"?
LOL
Oh, and I didn't say DOD "pass", I said "clearance" (as in access to classified material). Trust me, that is a very in-depth investigation.
Are you a homophobe, do you advocate outing all the Whitehouse reporters and investigating their private lives? The Democrats are simply gay baiting on a huge scale. Dean cries when someone associates the DNC with Lynne Stewart and the National Lawyers Guild, who founded the Deaniac MoveOn.Org, if a Republican accused a MSM reporter of homosexual behavior, it would be a hate crime.
Am I missing something? What in the world is wrong with a reporter who has an agenda ? Its not like this has never happened before. I'm personally at a loss to understand what a reporters sex life, financial life, and even his affiliations have to do with having access. If anything granting access to a wide range of reporters large and small, liberal and conservative, broke and rich, gay and straight etc, makes for a better overall group which can bring their various biases to bear.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/01/24/eveningnews/main537928.shtml
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.