To: freeholland
Justice Breyer responded by saying, among other things, that law emerges from conversations among law practitioners, law students, and academics. How odd. I thought that law "emerged" from the deliberate, public actions of the elected representatives of the American citizens.
Silly, silly Tax-chick, living in her little fantasy world ...
2 posted on
02/18/2005 1:06:09 PM PST by
Tax-chick
( The old woman who lives in the 15-passenger van.)
To: freeholland
Great article.
I plan to pick up Mark Levin's new book this weekend. I believe it is called "Men In Black". I heard him on Rush on Wednesday and it really piqued my curiosity. From what I could gather, it deals with the Supremes and how they have gotten into the habit of making law that conforms with their worldview rather than interpreting the Constitution. Based on this article, it sounds like he is very much on the mark.
3 posted on
02/18/2005 1:25:39 PM PST by
Big Red Clay
(Greetings from the Big Red State)
To: freeholland
Justice Scalia began his reply by stating that most of the parts of it should be posed to Justice Breyer, simply because [unlike Breyer] Scalia does not use foreign law in the interpretation of the U.S. Constitution.Heh-heh...
To: freeholland
bookmarking for a later read, thx
14 posted on
02/19/2005 8:26:18 PM PST by
Apogee
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson