Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cosmic Explosion Among the Brightest in Recorded History
NASA ^ | 18 February 2005 | Staff

Posted on 02/18/2005 12:19:03 PM PST by PatrickHenry

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: PatrickHenry
Something you don't see every day.

...and thankfully we do not see this every day or we would run out of days very quickly as a species!

A severe gamma burst could eradicate all life on earth. Of course, it probably would not be strong enough to kill us all at once, but enough to make us linger for a few days in pain.......

Hey! It's Friday! Think happy thoughts!

21 posted on 02/18/2005 12:35:06 PM PST by Erik Latranyi (9-11 is your Peace Dividend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
>Scientists have detected a flash of light from across the Galaxy so powerful that it bounced off the Moon and lit up the Earth's upper atmosphere. The flash was brighter than anything ever detected from beyond our Solar System and lasted over a tenth of a second.

Birth Name: Paris Whitney Hilton
Birthdate: February 17, 1981
Birthplace: New York, New York
Occupations: Actor, Writer, Musician, Model
Quote: "That's hot!"
Claim to Fame: Heiress to the Hilton Hotel empire

22 posted on 02/18/2005 12:37:35 PM PST by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flyer
From the article:

"The light was brightest in the gamma-ray energy range, far more energetic than visible light or X-rays and invisible to our eyes."

23 posted on 02/18/2005 12:38:50 PM PST by RobRoy (They're trying to find themselves an audience. Their deductions need applause - Peter Gabriel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Patti_ORiley

Dr. Banner, paging Dr. Banner...


24 posted on 02/18/2005 12:42:04 PM PST by green pastures
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy
The light was brightest in the gamma-ray energy range

Right, but it also said "The apparent magnitude was brighter than a full moon"

Inquiring minds want to know!

25 posted on 02/18/2005 12:42:34 PM PST by Flyer (Got Domain? - $8.99 a Year! - https://dahtcom.nameservices.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Flyer

Wow! You are right. It did not specifically say that none of the spectrum was visible to the naked eye.

I usually nail other people for making these kind of assumptions and you nailed me! Good job!

Now I have to kill you.... 8^>


26 posted on 02/18/2005 12:45:46 PM PST by RobRoy (They're trying to find themselves an audience. Their deductions need applause - Peter Gabriel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

I had advance warning and played it safe.

27 posted on 02/18/2005 12:47:51 PM PST by polymuser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy

At least have the decency to send flowers to my funeral.


28 posted on 02/18/2005 12:49:38 PM PST by Flyer (Got Domain? - $8.99 a Year! - https://dahtcom.nameservices.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy; Flyer
An interesting item of note is that the constellations we see are made up of the brightest stars. Even in the same constellation these stars are at different distances from the Earth. Some may be dimmer than the others, however, being closer they are just as bright as a larger one further away. The brightness of a star is called its magnitude. There are two ways astronomers measure magnitude: Apparent Magnitude and Absolute Magnitude.

The Apparent Magnitude is how bright a star appears to us here on the Earth. The Absolute Magnitude is how bright a star would appear if it were exactly ten parsecs away from the Earth. (Close to 33 light years).

Two notes:

1) Apparent magnitude is usually denoted with a small “m” and absolute magnitude uses a capital “M”.

2) The magnitude scale is backwards of what you might think, the larger the number the fainter the object.

29 posted on 02/18/2005 12:53:16 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

It hit here on December 27th. When do you suppose it left "there?"


30 posted on 02/18/2005 12:55:51 PM PST by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rudder

I'm thinking at least a week, not counting bathroom stops.

Maybe more.


31 posted on 02/18/2005 12:59:31 PM PST by RobRoy (They're trying to find themselves an audience. Their deductions need applause - Peter Gabriel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer; RobRoy

We had a full moon on December 26, so it wouldn't have been naked eye noticeable anyway.


32 posted on 02/18/2005 1:00:44 PM PST by Flyer (Got Domain? - $8.99 a Year! - https://dahtcom.nameservices.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Rudder
It hit here on December 27th. When do you suppose it left "there?"

About 50,000 years ago. The article says:

... two of many observatories that observed the event, arising from neutron star SGR 1806-20, about 50,000 light years from Earth in the constellation Sagittarius.

33 posted on 02/18/2005 1:03:41 PM PST by PatrickHenry (<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Flyer
The flash was brighter than anything ever detected from beyond our Solar System and lasted over a tenth of a second.

I need to think back to where I was on December 27

DAMN! I missed it, I blinked...DO OVER!

34 posted on 02/18/2005 1:09:33 PM PST by frogjerk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Rudder

Of course, if the universe is only 6,000 years old, that would change my previous answer.


35 posted on 02/18/2005 1:10:03 PM PST by PatrickHenry (<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Oh my! I don't think the literal genesis crowd can explain this one, unless, of course, they've found a way to accelerate the speed of light while we weren't paying attention.


36 posted on 02/18/2005 1:15:14 PM PST by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Allan

Bump


37 posted on 02/18/2005 1:16:27 PM PST by Allan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Something you don't see every day.

Considering it was invisible gamma rays, it's something you'll continue to not see any day.

38 posted on 02/18/2005 1:18:22 PM PST by coloradan (Hence, etc.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeremiah Jr

gamma-ray bursts ping


39 posted on 02/18/2005 1:18:40 PM PST by Thinkin' Gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rudder
Oh my! I don't think the literal genesis crowd can explain this one, unless, of course, they've found a way to accelerate the speed of light while we weren't paying attention.

Oh, the YECs have various "The speed of light has radically changed" theories, actually.

40 posted on 02/18/2005 1:29:53 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson