Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JFK_Lib

I certainly agree with you on the historical relevence of the Old Testament books after Genesis. I do not, however, believe in the literal Genesis creation.


11 posted on 02/18/2005 8:37:55 AM PST by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: doc30
I certainly agree with you on the historical relevence of the Old Testament books after Genesis. I do not, however, believe in the literal Genesis creation.

Not sure how that rates the 'however'.

I dont believe in a literal Genesis creation either. I believe the account a myth that contains with in it primarily religious truths, but a few scientific gems as well.

Even if the author of Genesis knew exactly what happened in the creation of the universe, I cant imagine that he could communicate it well to the pastoral nation of his time, and so used alegory.

The important Truths about Creationism are that:

1) the Universe has a design and a purpose.

2) that Life has a design and a purpose, and

3) that mankind has a Designer and a purpose.

Beyond that, using Genesis for inspiration as it was in the formulation of the Big Bang theory and then letting science do its job seem to be the best way to approach the situation if one is genuinely looking for the Truth about the world around us.

14 posted on 02/18/2005 9:34:54 AM PST by JFK_Lib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson