Rizzo, who has seen photographs of Jackson's genitals, claims that "It looks like a barber's pole"
I agree, far too much information about this walking freak-show.
But on a legal point: how can the victim provide "damning testimony" about Jackson's genitals? Since Rizzo has seen the "hard evidence" (pun intended), and since Rizzo is working for the victim's family, couldn't Jackson's defense make a reasonable argument that the victim (or his family) was "coached" or otherwise tainted by Rizzo?
Or they could logically assume that since Jackon is a total freak, he would have freakish genitalia.
I wonder if he has a third nipple like Christopher Lee in "The Man With The Golden Gun."