Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gidget7
"no one has shown me convincing proof that any of the stuff the supposed found on Gannon was in fact true"

Maybe I'm just not blindly partisan enough for FR, but is no one else struck by the fact that "Gannon" has not denied it is him on the sites? Or that he is/was a male escort?

74 posted on 02/18/2005 10:36:16 AM PST by lugsoul (Until at last I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin on the mountainside.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]


To: lugsoul
He retained a lawyer, who told him not to.

In this day and age, I just find it real suspect that all this pops up. When this guy goes for his first press pass, he declared both his pen name and his given name. It just seems to me, the first thing the White House would do is a google type search, in checking this guy out. Would not these pictures etc, have turned up then?

I just can't escape this nagging doubt that I know what the Clintons and their ilk are capable of. Isn't it possible, Gannon saw what he was up against and got a lawyer? We know Shrillery tried to take down other websites and silence it's reporters. I don't know, I just have a gut feeling about all this, it reeks like the maneuvers pulled in MA by our so called congressmen.
76 posted on 02/18/2005 10:56:16 AM PST by gidget7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson