I justify no one's existence nor any of the commercial conduct (i.e., prostitution) alleged, although I really don't believe that is the most important aspect of this.
IMHO, the liberal hounds going after someone for a conservative question, albeit a question poorly phrased by someone with a lot to hide, is the most important part of this.
The individual's misconduct is less a concern to me than the misconduct of the liberal press pack.
I appreciate that you believe that the individual's misconduct is the key issue here.
We'll just have to disagree.
I read your posts. You made some good arguments. But ultimately, conservatives with skeletons cannot put themselves in high profile positions. If you want to sit in on WH briefings and call attention to yourself then you better be squeaky clean. You cannot be fighting important battles all the while throwing your ammunition over the wall to load your enemies' magazines. Then you spend all your time spinning your wheels in defending the indefensible rather than getting the job done. That's the reality whether we like it or not.
Now my previous comments assume the allegations were true. If they're false, then by God, I want some small affirmation from kristinn or Gannon to that affect before I stick up for this guy. It doesn't have to be public. If Gannon/Guckert says "My lawyer said to shut up", then at the very least he should say "We're gonna sue and we're gonna win!"