[lugsoul]

I don't. And I don't have to trust them. I've seen two of the sites they referenced. I've seen Gannon's interviews. I've seen the pics. I've seen his lack of any denial that the pics are him. And I've seen the interview with the web designer who says he put up the sites.

You don't have to trust them, either. All you have to do is let go of your presumption. There is no doubt - none - that if he were a liberal reporter in the Clinton White House in the same situation, you'd already have him convicted.

[Darksheare]

But you do understand my skepticism.
The only place I've heard this stuff mentioned is places like Kos.
The moonbats at DU are going bananas over this and saying such insane stuff as "this will take down the bush regime", which shows their real agenda behind it.
Honestly, it doesn't matter to them if anything is factual or not, they'll use it.
Just like the 'fake but accurate' Dan Rather memos.

I will personally wait until I hear why his lawyer told him to shut up.
And honestly, I think his lawyer's an idiot for that.

[DJ MacWoW]

You don't have to trust them, either. All you have to do is let go of your presumption. There is no doubt - none - that if he were a liberal reporter in the Clinton White House in the same situation, you'd already have him convicted.

You mean as was done to McGreevey on FR? Oh. Wait. Most Freepers were only concerned about the NJ Gov putting unqualified people in places of trust then using his gay status to coverup the coming storm.

Let me ask you a pertinent question. Do you know the sexual status of anyone else in the WH press corps? No? Why not?