No, he quoted the 2nd DCA's decision in 2003. Still, hardly worthwhile, knowing that Greer was the one who said that he considered *all* the evidence.
Well, he can't be much of a researcher if he didn't bother looking at any of the evidence, which is widely available. I can't imagine deciding that someone must be killed, and not having a clue as to why. I would hope Melas never serves on a jury, where actual evidence must be considered.