I have no agenda. None. None at all. I simply searched "Schiavo CAT scan" with GOOGLE after reading the initial claim. It only takes a minute to find the information.
I also googled. Here's something you may not have taken into consideration.
http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:o4-kgbW72h4J:www.sptimes.com/2003/11/10/Tampabay/Schiavo_tapes__snippe.shtml+Schiavo+CAT+scan&hl=en&ie=UTF-8
"By the court's count, (Hammesfahr) gave 105 commands to Terri Schiavo and, at his direction, Mrs. Schindler gave an additional six commands," Greer wrote. "He asked her 61 questions and Mrs. Schindler ... asked her an additional 11 questions. The court saw few actions that could be considered responsive to either those commands or those questions."
Please note that the court acknowledges that it saw *few* actions that could be considered responsive. That means there were *some* responses. The fact of the matter is that the law specifically stipulates that there be *no* responses of any kind to be considered PVS by the Florida statutes. Even the court admits that Terri doesn't fit the bill for the label, yet it gives her a death sentence anyway. Methinks there is an agenda going on. The Nazis called it the T-4 euthanasia program.