Here's wondering if this "hearty applause" will be dutifully removed like was the cascade of thunderous boos for Hillary at the New York City 9-11 Concert!
I think Hillary could be very beatable....but we must have a good candidate and good campaign to beat her. She is a talented politician, and the last talented politician to run for President was Bill Clinton, and he was a two termer.
The mainstream media will be in her corner, and we must not forget that 2004 was relatively close, considering how poor a candidate they put up. It was a decisive victory, but certainly far from a landslide.
I HATE it when liberals smarten up. It makes our work all the more difficult.
I wonder if Mr. Geffen believes Hillary isn't liberal enough and that's why she can't win.
|
December 7, 1941+64 RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton
The context of our concern today--regardless of political affiliation--is Iraq and The War on Terror, but the larger fear is that our democracy may not survive. We have the requisite machines, power and know-how to defeat the enemy in Iraq and elsewhere, but do we have the will? In particular, do we have the will to identify and defeat the enemy in our midst? Answerable to no one, heir apparent in her own mind, self-serving in the extreme, Hillary Clinton incarnates this insidious new threat to our survival. What we decide to do about Missus Clinton will tell us much about what awaits us in these perilous new times. COMPLETE LETTER |
Hillary Clinton's revisionist tome notwithstanding, 'living history' begets a certain symmetry. It is in that light that I make this not-so-modest proposal on this day, exactly 64 years after the attack on Pearl Harbor.