Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Democrats' dilemma (Laugh/Barf Alert)
WorldNetDaily ^ | February 16, 2005 | Patrick J. Buchanan

Posted on 02/17/2005 8:47:16 PM PST by The Loan Arranger

Since Bush's November victory, which brought GOP gains in the House, Senate and state capitals, confirming the Republican Party as "America's Party," Democrats have seemed adrift and despondent.

Moderates and major contributors are reacting to the election of Howard Dean as party chair as conservative alumni might react to news that SDS had just taken over the campus of the alma mater.

A word of counsel to the disconsolate: Suck it up. It is not all that bad. The Right spent years in deserts more barren than thee have ever known. When this writer went to work for Richard Nixon in 1965, Republicans had lost seven of nine presidential elections, held Congress for but four of the previous 35 years and had carried 38 percent of the presidential vote – in a two-man race.

Goldwater had lost 44 states. A massacre had ensued on the Hill, with the GOP ranks reduced to 140 House seats and 38 senators. Nixon was a two-time loser who had, all assumed, committed hara-kiri in his 1962 "last press conference," where he had rounded on the jackal pack that had bedeviled him since the Alger Hiss case. "Think of all the fun you'll be missing," Nixon railed. "You won't have Dick Nixon to kick around anymore."

In 1966, the dark night was suddenly over and the sun came out. The GOP picked up 47 House seats and six senators, and Nixon would go on to lead the party into an era where Republicans would win the presidency five times in six elections, capture both houses of Congress in 1994 and become America's party.

Instead of bewailing their fate, Democrats should study how the Nixon-Reagan new majority displaced FDR's New Deal coalition.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Mexico; Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: deepthroat; lostdems; msnbc; paleocon; patbuchanan; xenophobe
Pat, Pat, Pat! To think, you were once one of us....sort of. Go ahead and give free advice to the DUmmies, it's worth what you're charging for it.
1 posted on 02/17/2005 8:47:23 PM PST by The Loan Arranger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: The Loan Arranger
2005: The Splintering of the Democratic Party
2 posted on 02/17/2005 8:50:54 PM PST by Publius (The people of a democracy choose the government they want, and they ought to get it good and hard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Loan Arranger

There seems to be a malady that people who loose the Presidential election fall victim to...they cannot believe they lost and slowly, incrementally, slip in bitter senility.


3 posted on 02/17/2005 8:53:55 PM PST by maine-iac7 (."...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time" LINCOLN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Loan Arranger

Pat is pandering to just about everyone these days. He'll make a great president, or not. LOL!


4 posted on 02/17/2005 8:56:45 PM PST by Trippin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trippin
What is the Democrats Dilemma?

They're Socialists. A failed ideology that produced misery and death to whomever was under it. Until that party cleans itself out, it will be a minority party. One day not a political party after all.
5 posted on 02/17/2005 9:07:13 PM PST by libertarianben (Looking for sanity and his hard to find cousin common sense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: The Loan Arranger

Good. I hope the Dems listen to Pat. If anyone knows how to lose it's him.


6 posted on 02/17/2005 9:24:23 PM PST by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Loan Arranger

The democrat party is not recognizable from the party it was in 1964.


7 posted on 02/17/2005 10:00:10 PM PST by KC_Conspirator (This space outsourced to India)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Loan Arranger
Instead of bewailing their fate, Democrats should study how the Nixon-Reagan new majority displaced FDR's New Deal coalition.

Better yet, don't study it!

8 posted on 02/17/2005 11:14:04 PM PST by AlaskaErik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Loan Arranger
Pat is not a Republican (not even registered as such now) and has little in common with conservatives. He stands for little that Republicans stand for (against the war in Iraq, against Israel, protectionist, etc.). He has more in common with Nadar than Bush!

He dropped his biggest conservative position (abortion) to allow himself to be routed as the Reform Party candidate (we are lucky he ran so that party could go the way of the Wigs).

He is yesterday's, no yesteryear's news.
9 posted on 02/18/2005 5:13:06 AM PST by NeilGus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson