[bigLusr]

Point taken. I'd forgotten that dissenting opinions are legally binding...

...oh, wait. They're not.

Defensive much? I never implied Lemon had been overturned... just that it should be. But since you bring it up... a majority of the justices do want to get rid of or modify the Lemon test... See, for example:

• Rehnquist in Wallace v. Jaffree.
• O'Connor in Corp. of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. Amos
• Stevens in Comm. for Pub. Educ. & Religious Liberty v. Regan
• Kennedy in Allegheny v. ACLU
• Scaliaand Thomas in Lee v. Weisman

[Dimensio]

Funny how a "majority" want to overturn or modify it, yet it still stands today. Wonder how that is.