I see. I have been away from the keyboard a great deal this week, and suddenly the story looks totally different than when I last read it carefully.
So the liberals are frothing at the mouth because he's gay? I thought that would endear him to them for sure! (And I'm sure he's the first gay newsman ever, right?) (cough)
I don't think it's even established that he's gay. He might be but that could not be their objection. Nor is it. This is all about being from a "legitimate" news agncy and really it is all because he was conservative. Keep in mind he quit, claiming he was being followed, harrassed and threatened. If his secret is a gay secret, he essentially was threatened with an outing. Hardly something the liberal media is supposed to support. Nor do they really want to acknowledge there are conservative gays.