I don't agree with the six-day thing, either. But, on the other hand, I am not sure someone who does make that part of his framework of faith deserves to be ridiculed like that, especially here. It's that sort of attitude that makes me suspect there is more to the pro-evolution stance than cold science.
Are you honestly afraid that all the DannyTNs out there are going to plunge us into another Dark Ages? Is that going to be a part of the coming Bush Theocracy I'm always hearing about?
With all due respect, it is disappointing, and does absolutely nothing to help persuade other people to your point of view.
Humor is the best way to point out human foibles.
I happen to be a Christian and a Bible scholar. So, if you don't want to hear about the flaws in literalist interpretation, fine.
I also know that too many people who think they are being good Christians are being duped into ruining science education in this country.
We can't have that. In the 20 years I have tried to teach people the science, not one creationist has ever stopped repeating the scam artist nonsense back to me, after I patiently exposed it as a complete fraud. I now am exposing the literalist Bible view as complete nonsense also.
What is disappointing is people trying to corrupt the Gospel with misinterpretation of Genesis.