First of all your picture of the skull has no label no caption so I have no idea what I am supposed to claim what it is not.
Second Why the personal attacks you sound like a liberal just personal attacking instead of having a polite discourse.
Third The way that most Darwinists today claim that species evolve is through mutations. Mutations are too rare to be produce even the necessary traits for just one life form to survive let alone the thousand upon thousands of species in the world today. Mutations are almost always harmful, and they are never beneficial. NOT ONCE has there ever been a truly beneficial mutation documeted out of the hundreds of thousands of experiements done. Sickle Cell Anemia is the "one good" mutation evolutionists point too, but it causes serious anemia, pain and death in those aflicted with it
Most people would say that they show a slow morphing of shall we say adjacently similar things into something different. You need labels so you can go Google up some dumb-dumbisms from AiG to throw out some links and make them "missing" again.
I'll fast-forward us if you don't mind. I've already seen all those web pages and can do this faster than you, member since last night, can.
<Cretinism_mode>
Solly Zuckerman said bad stuff about Lucy (Australopithecus afarensis). Toss all the australopithecines.</Cretinism_mode>Some "evolutionists" argue that Homo habilis should be grouped with the australopithecines, so throw that out. Ergaster and erectus are close to the same, and Gish says erectus is some kind of ape. Toss.
Neanderthals are arthritic modern men. Toss. Cro-Magnon is modern man. Toss.
All gone! So where is the evidence?
But why does the picture make the picture it does? What would an example of "missing links" look like if not exactly that?
Second Why the personal attacks you sound like a liberal just personal attacking instead of having a polite discourse.
I'm already mad because for six years now I don't get answers and I'm not getting them from you. What are you thumping your chest and demanding? We have plenty of it. Plenty, plenty, plenty. Here's a list of just the vertebrate tree of life up to about 1997.
The whole posturing you guys do is all so bogus. You're never going to allow any evidence. Never. Why pretend otherwise?
Third The way that most Darwinists today claim that species evolve is through mutations.
When you show up demanding hard evidence already there in abundance for anyone who desires, don't expect anyone to care if no one can make you see your own misunderstandings about mechanism. We have incredible amounts of evidence for common descent. I want to see you got that before I waste any time explaining that we also understand a fair amount about how that happens.