Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mike Fieschko

The thorne in his side was that he was an unapologetic homophobe!


10 posted on 02/17/2005 1:07:54 PM PST by Bertha Fanation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Bertha Fanation
The thorne in his side was that he was an unapologetic homophobe!

No, that's the thorn in the LIBs' side!

16 posted on 02/17/2005 1:12:16 PM PST by frogjerk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Bertha Fanation

Why must one be a "phobe" to dislike or preach against something abhorrent?

I guess that, by your simple minded twisting of the english language that we all are:
Murderphobes
Rapephobes
Molestaphobes

Crawl back under your rock.


30 posted on 02/17/2005 1:32:56 PM PST by AnOldCowhand (The west is dead. You may lose a sweetheart, but you will never forget her - Charles Russell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Bertha Fanation
Re: "The thorne in his side was that he was an unapologetic homophobe!"
The thorne in his thide was that he was an unapologetic homophobe!

Sorry I couldn't resist
45 posted on 02/17/2005 1:51:21 PM PST by Mark in the Old South (Sister Lucia of Fatima pray for us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: EdReform; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; stage left; Yakboy; I_Love_My_Husband; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping.

Relevant article because St Paul was (according to the homosexuals and their sympathizers) an "unapologetic homophobe" as exhibited in post #10.

If you want on/off the ping list see my profile page.

74 posted on 02/17/2005 2:59:40 PM PST by DirtyHarryY2K (''Go though life with a Bible in one hand and a Newspaper in the other" -- Billy Graham)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Bertha Fanation
The thorne in his side was that he was an unapologetic homophobe!

If that was supposed to be tongue-in-cheek, you might want to practice a little bit more before attempting that posting style again.

On the other hand, if you were deadly serious, then enjoy the ride...
85 posted on 02/17/2005 3:15:02 PM PST by beezdotcom (I'm usually either right or wrong...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Bertha Fanation
The thorne in his side was that he was an unapologetic homophobe!

Him and God, both! LOL
111 posted on 02/17/2005 4:03:27 PM PST by Bear_Slayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Bertha Fanation

If this is sarcasm, please include the /sarcasm tag.

If not, please explain to me what is good about homosexuality?


141 posted on 02/17/2005 5:20:26 PM PST by rwfromkansas ("War is an ugly thing, but...the decayed feeling...which thinks nothing worth war, is worse." -Mill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Bertha Fanation
The thorne in his side was that he was an unapologetic homophobe!

ROTFLMHO!!!

155 posted on 02/17/2005 8:29:35 PM PST by Dajjal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Bertha Fanation
The thorne in his side was that he was an unapologetic homophobe!

Peter made the case against fornication before Paul had anything to say about it. See Acts 15

196 posted on 02/18/2005 6:05:36 PM PST by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson