Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Texas Federalist

that is why I said it would lead to too much intervention.....but on the side, and I wouldn't argue this on FR cause of the flak, but I am of the opinion that smokers, obese people etc should pay higher premiums because risky optional behavior does effect all of us in the long run with higher costs, less production etc. I know there are other variables and others will start in with me about other lesser things.....again, this is just my opinion.


105 posted on 02/17/2005 12:42:23 PM PST by NorCalRepub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]


To: NorCalRepub

I agree with you. If you are a smoker or a glutton, the insurance company's have every right to charge you for it. You are free to engage in conduct, but still must face any non-goverment-imposed consequences.


107 posted on 02/17/2005 12:52:35 PM PST by Texas Federalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson