Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: antiRepublicrat
"Two, it was about hypothetical systems, not real and tested (it was basically just counting exploits)."

Most tests are hypothetical.
Take any ZDNET benchmarks or the TPC benchmarks or most other tests, and they have to make certain assumptions to imitate real life.
You are clutching at straws.

Thiu just proves what the guy in post 3 above said, and I quote:

"This theory will NEVER be accepted by the already-hate-spewing
venemous Anti-Microsoft crowd. It just cannot be!"


He was right. :)
45 posted on 02/17/2005 10:36:43 AM PST by KwasiOwusu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: KwasiOwusu
Most tests are hypothetical. Take any ZDNET benchmarks or the TPC benchmarks or most other tests, and they have to make certain assumptions to imitate real life.

Those benchmarks actually have computers running them. This was just a vulnerability count, nothing more, entirely theoretical.

87 posted on 02/17/2005 11:23:28 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson