To: TheBigB
One thing left out of the article ... how the Youngs sued the girls for pain and suffering. The judge had enough sense not to award them that.
To: kemathen7
One thing left out of the article ... how the Youngs sued the girls for pain and suffering. The judge had enough sense not to award them that.
Not just pain and suffering, but also the cost of installing a motion detector light on the porch as well.
The judge agreed to award the medical bills because all parties agreed to that amount. Had the other families objected, I doubt she would have even gotten that.
As to her whining about the problems - gee, if you go make a court case out of a plate of cookies, you're going to get razzed for it. It's how the cookie crumbles, don'tcha know.
24 posted on
02/17/2005 9:32:17 AM PST by
kingu
(Which would you bet on? Iraq and Afghanistan? Or Haiti and Kosovo?)
To: kemathen7
Since when is it a crime to knock at a neighbors door at night to drop off cookies?Maybe I could understand splitting the medical bills but this lady shouldn't get a dime just because she's a drama queen.
215 posted on
02/17/2005 12:26:21 PM PST by
rdcorso
(Liberals Save A Murderers Life & Demand The Innocent Be Aborted & Starved)
To: kemathen7
yes, the youngs are pretty whale squeeze, BUT were they just in small claims court or did an actual bar certified attorney represent them??
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson