Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: drt1

There are too many teams as it is now. I could see a few of the franchises in areas that aren't really natural hockey areas going under. The NHL expanded way too much, and way too fast. I could see the Florida franchises surviving due to all the snowbird retirees, but for places like Phoenix, Atlanta, and Nashville, they could easily be gone by the time the next puck is dropped.


13 posted on 02/17/2005 6:28:24 AM PST by ABG(anybody but Gore) (Ted Kennedy: Boldly driving a '68 Olds where no '68 Olds had gone before)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ABG(anybody but Gore); AmishDude; arichtaxpayer; Betis70; CurlyBill; Hat-Trick

You said it right ABG. Way too much and too fast. If the salary caps were the sticking point, and the Owners have a shred of truth in their need to cap costs to survive, then I can't see how there won't be shrinkage after this disaster. If a team was marginal it is now not viable - And there are about four or five that fit that description.


30 posted on 02/17/2005 6:36:54 AM PST by drt1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: ABG(anybody but Gore)

Whats a natural hockey area? If this requires frozen ponds,
probably only Ontario, Quebec, and Nunavut qualify.

Noone thought much about hockey in San Jose till the Sharks
came to town. Their arrival triggered building of Ice Centre, expanded the rec leagues (which support various
hockey equipment stores), brought lots of people downtown
to spend money, and put dollars into the city coffers.

Anyplace can be a natural hockey area..


44 posted on 02/17/2005 6:52:46 AM PST by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson