Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xm177e2

No he isn't. He wanted to see evidence of it so he could get a congressional investigation together. He is just as bad.


12 posted on 02/16/2005 3:45:25 PM PST by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: pbrown

Whatever his motives, Frank challenged Jordan in public.


15 posted on 02/16/2005 3:57:06 PM PST by jjmcgo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: pbrown
No he isn't. He wanted to see evidence of it so he could get a congressional investigation together. He is just as bad.

If there is evidence that US forces deliberately murdered journos, we should have a friggin' congressional investigation, it would be a tremendous outrage. Our armed forces are not a bunch of savage murderers.

Here's what Michelle Malkin wrote:

Just got off the phone with Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), who spoke with me about Easongate. Rep. Frank was on the panel at Davos.

Rep. Frank said Eason Jordan did assert that there was deliberate targeting of journalists by the U.S. military. After Jordan made the statement, Rep. Frank said he immediately "expressed deep skepticism." Jordan backed off (slightly)

Frank stood up for our military in Davos, when he didn't have to.

You just don't like him because he's a gay liberal Democrat, fine, you don't have to like him, but give credit where it's due.

I get the feeling he could take a bullet for President Bush and you would just accuse him of trying to hog the limelight.

19 posted on 02/16/2005 6:51:35 PM PST by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson