I really like Laura Ingraham too (and ditto on the pic request). Hannity is like vanilla pudding, Savage like the brown acid at Woodstock. Neither is a good spokesman for the cause. One's comes off as an intellectual lightweight, the other thinks he's an expert an every subject (battle strategy, for instance) because he has a Phd in botany, or whatever.
Laura points out the hypocrisy of the left. Rush and Medved provoke thought. If the idea is to convert the middle, I vote for one of these three (sorry, unable to get Levin on the dial here).
I totally agree with you....Rush and Medved, Ingraham put out good solid intelligent discourse.....Savage is smart as hell but unstable and a raving lunitic sometimes....Sean while his heart is in the right place is just a sound piece for the Admin, parrots alot of other conservative thought and worse, interrupts as much or more than anyone but Chrissy Matthews and throws those little pathetic passive aggressive hysterics when someone won't answer his otherwise mundane and off subject question.....
Did you see Laura on O'Reilly when she told him he had forgotten who made him? Bet she won't be invited back!