I haven't heard or watched Hannity's shows in several years. He was a bulldog in the days of Clinton. His presentations and form(what ever that means) were great. He was one of the few we could count on in the days of Clinton.
His remark about FR is a little thin skinned.
It's a shame he doesn't understand what makes FreeRepublic so great...but, I won't make the same type of mistake and rationalize away all that Shawn has done well.
I like to listen and learn from a debate, or what passes for a debate on his show.
I find it far too shallow and emotional hyperbole seems to rule the day.
I give him credit for some good long interviews and the like, but the show is stagnant, as is the radio prog.