Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ClintonBeGone
Funny how most of the judges that the contitution provides to be the arbitors of such claims have laughed statements like these out of their courtrooms.

"I write separately only to express my view that the very notion of a ‘substantial effects’ test under the Commerce Clause is inconsistent with the original understanding of Congress’ powers and with this Court’s early Commerce Clause cases. By continuing to apply this rootless and malleable standard, however circumscribed, the Court has encouraged the Federal Government to persist in its view that the Commerce Clause has virtually no limits. Until this Court replaces its existing Commerce Clause jurisprudence with a standard more consistent with the original understanding, we will continue to see Congress appropriating state police powers under the guise of regulating commerce."

-Justice Clarence Thomas

83 posted on 02/16/2005 12:29:53 PM PST by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic

Justice Clarence Thomas has obviously been kidnapped by loserdopian book-readers!


86 posted on 02/16/2005 12:44:30 PM PST by headsonpikes (Spirit of '76 bttt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson