Posted on 02/16/2005 1:22:41 AM PST by Dallas59
Too many of those and my lifting mechanism isn't worth a damn, let alone my frictionless tracking ability. Or so I've been told.
Retired?
No, he’s just on a trip.
Art's out hunting Wild Turkey.
Art unretired. But he only works weekends. Lucky Art!
"[snip] They had almost extricated themselves ..."
You could show that on TV way back then??? Musta been a wardrobe malfunction.
I think that was X minus 1. or something like that,
used to listen to it in Chicago. SiFi radio plays.
Used a little crystal radio shaped like a rocket, Jeez
I was all of 10 years old.
First of all, we probably don't have a clue as to what type of propulsion systems UFOs use. We just know that it's certainly more sophisticated, as they can take off at great speeds, and so on.
Second of all, how do we know that India Daily isn't the equivalent of our National Enquirer?
Flatulence? :~)
"because apparently the UFO was using frictionless traction with anti-gravity lifting mechanisms"
Or was it just simulating their use to distract from it's real operating technology.
"I did not have sex with that woman" and "Did you know I was in Vietnam?"
...it's only repeating what it's picked up over and over again from Earth
I hate getting ledged, it almost always ruins the crease in my knickers
But can it photograph Constitutional penumbras? We've already got some jacklegs on retainer to interpret those.
The "chemical Imaging Camera" mentioned in the article is based upon a real device. It's likely an infrared spectrometer using a focal plane array detector. It operates in the mid infrared (2500 nm to 13,800 nm) rather than the near infrared where most IR cameras operate (780 nm to 1500 nm). The mid-IR is a spectral region that contains the chemical signatures of covalently bonded materials. A detector like this costs between $100K and $200K, depending upon resolution, and that does not include the cost of the rest of the spectrometer. They are typically used on FT-IR microscopes, but I have heard one company working on a macro-imaging system. Most of the major FT-IR instrument vendors offer such a system (i.e. Thermo Nicolet, BioRad (bought recently by Varian), Perkin Elmer, Bruker). I would love to get one in my lab, but they are way to expensive and our single point detectors on our microscopes are sufficient for the work I do.
Here is a link to the products offered by Varian.
http://www.varianinc.com/cgi-bin/nav?products/spectr/ftir/ftir_imaging/index&cid=QQIKNIHFO
Teeny spot - don't know what it is. First guess: "UFO ... using frictionless traction with anti-gravity lifting mechanisms". Beneath pathetic. Beneath comment.
A mid infrared imaging system needs a source of radiation to illuminate a target. I don't believe there is enough ambient light in the required spectral region to provide enough of a useful signal. The IR cameras most people working with operate at shorter wavelengths. Perhaps these "UFO" have stealth technology to avoid near IR detection, but can still be seen in the mid-IR.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.