Replies

I'm guessing you're part of a posse of clowns. My, my. You disagree with other FReepers around here and what do you get? You get a response we could expect from the Left. How about some legitimate debate instead of name-calling?

What are you afraid of? Seeing that Gannon/Guskert photos are indeed him? That he may have LIED about being more than just the web designer?

Yes, there are complications and implications far beyond the 'gay' issue here, but unless you look for the truth and deal with it, the Left will take the lies and run with 'em. They'll turn Gannon into the Valerie Plame 'outer' and not only blow this into a grand scale scandal but protect the people who are truly responsible.

We can't expect to just ignore what is being presented as fact and then hope it will go away. This has the capability of touching the administration and preparing the way for their planned impeachment proceedings; it's the flower girl dropping her petals as she makes her way down the aisle. They're busy making one big stinking bouquet for President Bush.

I'm with you, trumandogz, and I await my own list of pejorative posts from the FReepers with Blinders Club.

Gannon has resigned. The White House does not ask the sexual orientation of reporters; in fact, I believe it is illegal to do so.

What is the point in continuing to dredge up increasingly vile information on Gannon? Why does the MSM keep this story alive? Why are they fixated on homosexuality, and ignoring the four other non-MSM reporters that have been there for years?

I remain convinced this is a manufactured scandal. What I don't know is whether Gannon has been tarred unfairly, or if he deliberately placed himself into the White House with a ready-made "history" so that Brock could start the scandal mill running.

What I do know is that I am not going to allow the MSM to stampede me into some sort of hysteria, and I am not going to allow unverified accusations go unchallenged. And I am going to do my best to keep Free Republic from being painted as a bunch of homophobic nutcases.

I've looked...I do not have blinders on..Jeff was a much better journalist than depicted by the same blog if he got secret documents. Democrats.com has really gone over the cliff on this..

This is a minor reporter who had a day pass and asked a total of two questions in 2 years of the President..Many here did not even know who he was!

I cannot absolutely say the nudes are Jeff..same watch..This is something I find regrettable and embarrassing but hardly the big deal the left hopes..The gay bashing left..What irony.

I thought they believed in "it's only sex"/private life and had nothing to do with whether they are doing their job.