Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: trumandogz
IF it is not true the WP should will be sued.

Sued for what? If they were sniffing the inside of his shoes in his cloest, they should be sued for trespassing on private property. The fact his images were on a website means he had no problem flaunting his private life in public. You, on the other hand, are clueless, and obviously nothing more than a dingbat.

123 posted on 02/16/2005 12:50:51 AM PST by BigSkyFreeper (Smoke free since January 16, 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]


To: BigSkyFreeper
If the story is a complete fabrication such as the Rather thing the WP should be sued.
125 posted on 02/16/2005 12:52:26 AM PST by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

To: BigSkyFreeper
The fact his images were on a website means he had no problem flaunting his private life in public.
We might hold off on the "fact" aspect for just a wee bit longer... after all, I'm sure I saw Special Ops Cody holding Michael Jackson's umbrella today.

131 posted on 02/16/2005 12:55:01 AM PST by AnnaZ (Kakkate koi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson