Gays Debate Radical Steps to Curb Unsafe Sex

New York Times ^ | Feb. 15, 2005 | ANDREW JACOBS

[Jimmyclyde]

ping

[Jimmyclyde]

Sorry boys but there is no way to stop this now.You love your Homo sex to much.

You reap what you sow...

[goodnesswins]

SHEESH...they've tried to do this for years.....PLEASE, go back in the closet and discuss it, OKAY?

[viaveritasvita]

Gee, maybe if they stopped sodomizing each other.....

<><

[Alberta's Child]

There is a definite change in the air about this issue, and I see a striking similarity between some of the comments in this article and the infamous Bill Cosby comments over the last year or so.

What I suspect is that some straight-speaking leaders among these people (on both issues) realize that ordinary Americans simply don't give a sh!t about them and their fouled-up cultures and pathological behavior anymore.

[EagleUSA]

Well there is always hope of reducing the genocide from AIDS that the queers have brought upon themselves. Sex before safety -- total selfishness and stupidity of the leftist fringe -- their Midas Touch.

[Fan_Of_Ingraham]

But... but... but... I thought AIDS wasn't just a Gay Disease?

[Holicheese]

I heard a great phrase this morning. A gay activist who was of course blaming W for this new AIDs outbreak, said that many gay men were suffering from "PREVENTION FATIGUE SYNDROME". I guess that driving to the rest stop to have unprotected sex in the bushes and puting on a condom is so taxing that they stop putting on a condom!
Unbelievable

[thoughtomator]

It seems that their behavior is going to make it a moot point in a few months. They are literally going to kill themselves off, it's only a question of how long it takes. I just hope they don't inflict any additional new diseases upon society at large in the process.

[NativeNewYorker]

Three column spread above the fold on page one...oh, the Times isn't obsessed with this, oh no.

[No Dems 2004]

When I was a kid, someone told me that GAY stood for Got Aids Yet? I've always thought that a little harsh, but maybe it's not ...

[loborojo]

I always knew that it was a biological dead end. First, inability to have natural offspring and when that was circumvented, plague. Coincidence?

[KC_Conspirator]

Just wait. The media will try to sell this crap as "New Strain of AIDS is coming to a middle class, alffleunt, suburb near you". However, unlike the 90's, I am not sure they are going to get away with this crap this time.

[Jimmyclyde]

Three column spread above the fold on page one...oh, the Times isn't obsessed with this, oh no.

They don't call it "the old gay lady for nothing"...

[siunevada]

before a resurgent epidemic draws government officials who could use even more aggressive tactics.

Oh yeah, that's a real concern. That will happen right after Hollywood becomes obsessed with truth.

[Paradox]

I am not anti-gay. I am something of a Cheney on that one. However, it is abundantly clear that apart from whatever sexual practices they engage in, male homosexuals engage in risky sexual habits far more often than heterosexuals, or even lesbians. Risky sex is part of the buzz for many of them. Sex with strangers, with multiple partners, its pretty sick stuff that I would not condone for straight people either.

In this case, they certainly are reaping...

[blues_guitarist]

What a bunch of jackasses!

[underwiredsupport]

RADICAL SOLUTIONS DEBATED AND REJECTED BY THE PRO-GAY LOBBY.....

• Abstinence
• Self Control
• Moral Lifestyles
• Psychiatric Counseling
• Safe Sex
• Closing of ALL GAY BATHHOUSES
• Quarantine Individuals Identified Infected with AIDS

 

SOLUTIONS SELECTED BY THE PRO-GAY LOBBY

• Live and Let Live (well, you know what they mean!)
• Vote Democrat
• Safe Sex, if you want too!!
• More funding for AIDS research.

[the OlLine Rebel]

In the early years of the AIDS epidemic, gay men protested attempts to close down bathhouses and strenuously opposed efforts by health officials to trace those infected with the virus. Until now, those advocates, driven by concerns about privacy and the stigma associated with the disease, have successfully fought off efforts to impose a traditional public-health model for tackling the spread of the virus. And that is EXACTLY what they should have been doing all along - TB people were tracked and quarantined, etc. Why are these people so special? Cuz they're "gay", that's why. They must be privileged above every other kind of person. Heavens we should tag them as "infected" or ban/shut down places that are breeding grounds for the infection.