Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cyncooper
Do you want "unnamed sources" to be able to give disinformation to reporters in an effort to bring down a sitting President?

I'll take that risk. To absolutely allow the government to control the press is something I'd rather not risk.

39 posted on 02/15/2005 8:27:33 AM PST by Glenn (The two keys to character: 1) Learn how to keep a secret. 2) ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: Glenn

This is not the government controlling the press.

It's the press and rogue employees at State and the CIA trying to control the government.


47 posted on 02/15/2005 8:42:12 AM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: Glenn
Un-named sources are a propagandists dream. When ever I'm reading a news story and the term un-named source appears, I stop reading right there because it is no longer a news story but an unfounded rumor.

I was born and raised in the D.C. area and have seen the rumor mill that thrives there. Remember honesty is best. A forthright person is not afraid to speak the truth but a slanderer never wants their words to be ascribed to themselves.

51 posted on 02/15/2005 9:09:58 AM PST by fella
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson