Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dog

They'll have to choose to talk or not, but I doubt it's about "the leaker" as I don't think that's the angle being investigated as she more than likely wasn't undercover and there was no crime in telling reporters she in fact recommended her husband for the Niger trip.

Rather, I think there are other aspects of the story being looked into. Maybe leaking, but not of her "name". Maybe other documents.


19 posted on 02/15/2005 7:53:46 AM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: cyncooper
"Rather, I think there are other aspects of the story being looked into. Maybe leaking, but not of her "name". Maybe other documents."

I'm with you on that one. The list of reporters is longer than the Plame story and I've read elsewhere that other issues were being looked at by the GJ....

24 posted on 02/15/2005 8:01:14 AM PST by eureka! (It will not be safe to vote Democrat for a long, long, time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: cyncooper

The name of Plame's front company was exposed by the leak and because Plame used the front company name to make donations to ...who was it, Al Gore?


107 posted on 02/15/2005 6:39:45 PM PST by piasa (Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson