Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: advance_copy
Reagan's breaking up the Sovietized bureaucracy that was Ma Bell. The Gipper knew ...

The settlement of the antitrust case (The Modification of Final Judgment or "MFJ" as it became known) occurred under Reagon's DoJ, but the case was actually filed under Carter.

Reagan might have approved of the anti-bureaucrarcy thrust of the break-up, but he probably had little or nothing to do with it.

In practice, it was the brain-child of Judge Greene, and it would not be fair to characterize Judge Greene as being anti-bureaucratic. The MFJ created a lot of nonsensical rules and line of business restrictions on telecommunications companies.

I'm not defending the Bells, and I'm not sure what the answer is. Some wanted a more aggressive enforcement of the UNE-P rules. Personally, I would have welcomed a further break up of the incumbent LECs, stripping the network elements out from service provision.

You are right to separate MCI from the criminal conspiracy known as WorldCom.

MCI, of course, was not all sweetness and light. The company was founded (with the encouragement of the FCC) to exploit opportunities created by regulatory inefficiencies. In the early days, they were known as a law firm with an antenna on top.

MCI could also act like a monopoly when it had the power. They were real tough in negotiating access to their Internet backbone before the merger with WorldCom.

6 posted on 02/15/2005 7:40:38 AM PST by Martin Tell (Red States Rule)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Martin Tell
The settlement of the antitrust case (The Modification of Final Judgment or "MFJ" as it became known) occurred under Reagon's DoJ, but the case was actually filed under Carter.

The initial lawsuit was filed in 1974 by the Ford DOJ. It was the result of a 1969 Nixon administration investigation of the FDR legacy telephone monopoly. Carter continued it (he would have paid dearly if he had withdrawn it because Americans were sick of AT&T by then). But the MFJ would likely NOT have broken up the monopoly (just as the 1949 lawsuit didn't) without Reagan's DOJ. The 1982 agreement, which ended the lawsuit, between AT&T and the U.S. was a voluntary one, that Judge Greene encapsulated in the final order (MFJ).
10 posted on 02/15/2005 8:02:59 AM PST by advance_copy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson